Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.3
Excellent harmony
Top 2.8%FaceIQ Labs rates Phil Anselmo's Harmony at 7.3, 241st of 728 men on the wiki, in the top 34%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Chin to philtrum ratio and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Lower Third at 3.6 and Submental Cervical Angle at 2.4. Among the other celebrities, David Hasselhoff (7.3), Channing Tatum (7.3) and David Laid (7.3) sit closest. Alain Delon(prime) has the highest, at 9.0.
This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.5This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
8.76 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.5%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
3.4%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.0%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.0%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.9%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
1.7%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.4%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
1.2%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.8%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.6%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%9 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.5%Phil Anselmo's Harmony score is 7.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Phil Anselmo is ranked 241st of 728 men on the wiki, in the top 34%.