Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.6
Excellent harmony
Top 1.3%FaceIQ Labs rates Sofia Mattson's Harmony at 7.6, 153rd of 441 women on the wiki, in the top 35%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Brow Length to Face Width Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Lower Third Proportion at 3.3 and Nasofrontal Angle at 2.7. Brenda Schad (7.6), Amandla Stenberg (7.6) and Pamela Anderson (7.6) come closest to Sofia's Harmony score. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
9.3This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.19 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
5.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
5.3%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
4.7%The brow ridge is overly prominent, creating a heavier and more robust appearance than the ideal.
3.4%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.4%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
3.0%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.4%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
2.3%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.8%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
0.5%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
2.3%Sofia Mattson's Harmony score is 7.6 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Sofia Mattson is ranked 153rd of 441 women on the wiki, in the top 35%.