Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Loading ratio
Your Measurement

Your Measurement
1.81x
At 1.81x, Connor Chung's Face Width to Height Ratio is below its ideal range of 1.93 to 1.97x and scores 6.7. Facial Width-to-Height Ratio evaluates midface compactness by comparing its width to height, influenced by brow position, philtrum length, and lip fullness. The value is higher than 30% of the men on the wiki, and 15% of them measure inside the ideal range. Among the other celebrities, Armie Hammer (1.81x), Chico Lachowski (1.81x) and Chris Wood (1.81x) sit closest. At either end, Juan Pedro Franco has the highest at 2.64x and Julian Richings the lowest at 1.47x. Of his other Face Shape measurements, Cheekbone height (84.7%) is the strongest at 10.0 and Total Facial Width to Height Ratio (1.32x) the weakest at 8.8. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Connor Chung's Face Width to Height Ratio measures 1.81x, below its ideal range of 1.93 to 1.97x, for a score of 6.7.
At 1.81x, Connor Chung's Face Width to Height Ratio is higher than 28% of the 936 other men on the wiki, and 16% of them measure inside the ideal range.