Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Loading ratio
Your Measurement

Your Measurement
1.32x
At 1.32x, Connor Chung's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is below its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x and scores 8.8. Total Facial Height-to-Width Ratio compares facial length to width, distinguishing long, short, or balanced shapes. The value is higher than 25% of the men on the wiki, and 25% of them measure inside the ideal range. The closest values on the wiki belong to Adam Driver (1.32x), Alex Hormozi (1.32x) and Atesh Salih (1.32x). At either end, Ricky Berwick has the highest at 1.70x and Vincent Gallo the lowest at 0.70x. Of his other Face Shape measurements, Cheekbone height (84.7%) is the strongest at 10.0 and Face Width to Height Ratio (1.81x) the weakest at 6.7. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Connor Chung's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio measures 1.32x, below its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x, for a score of 8.8.
At 1.32x, Connor Chung's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is higher than 26% of the 936 other men on the wiki, and 25% of them measure inside the ideal range.