Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.6
Excellent harmony
Top 1.4%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Danielle (Dani) Evans scores 7.6, 244th of 757 women on the wiki, in the top 33%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Bigonial width and Chin to philtrum ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Face Width to Height Ratio at 1.7 and Browridge Inclination Angle at 0.3. Among the other celebrities, Lauren De Graaf (7.6), Sun Hi Lee (7.6) and Haley Kalil (7.5) sit closest. Sara Sampaio has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a proportionate facial structure; the lower face retains internal balance and harmony with the overall facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the chin sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating that the lower jaw is not recessed or overly projected.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
9.9This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.8This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
8.65 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.5The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
7.7%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
2.5%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
1.5%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.5%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
1.3%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.3%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
0.8%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.6%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.2%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.2%Danielle (Dani) Evans's Harmony score is 7.6 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Danielle (Dani) Evans is ranked 244th of 757 women on the wiki, in the top 33%.