Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


2.2
Poor harmony
Bottom 0.7%FaceIQ Labs rates Droupadi Murmu's Harmony at 2.2, 446th of 447 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements are Chin to philtrum ratio and Ear Protrusion Ratio, both at 10.0, and her weakest are Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) and Lateral Canthal Tilt, both at 0.0. Ali C. Lopez (1.6), Cherry Babe (3.0) and Elizabeth Moss (3.8) come closest to Droupadi's Harmony score. Sharam Diniz has the highest, at 9.2.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.1This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
8.77 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.9The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
9.2%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
8.9%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
8.8%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
8.8%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
5.6%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
5.2%The eyebrows are positioned too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
4.3%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
4.1%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.0%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
4.0%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.7%The brow ridge is overly prominent, creating a heavier and more robust appearance than the ideal.
3.6%The eyes are too slim and elongated, creating a squinted appearance.
3.5%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
3.1%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
3.1%The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
2.9%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.7%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
2.5%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.2%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.2%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
2.0%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.5%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.4%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
1.3%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.1%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
1.1%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.0%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.5%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.1%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.1%Droupadi Murmu's Harmony score is 2.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Droupadi Murmu is ranked 446th of 447 women on the wiki.