Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


5.1
Average harmony
Top 49%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Emily Ha scores 5.1, 636th of 679 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Ear Protrusion Ratio and Eye Aspect Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Mouth width to nose width ratio at 1.7 and Nasolabial Angle at 1.5. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Princess Diana (5.1), Cortney Reardanz (5.1) and Jennifer Lopez (5.1). The highest on the wiki is Sara Sampaio, at 9.2.
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.9This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.812 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
6.4%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
5.0%The upper lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
4.6%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
4.0%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
4.0%The upper lip extends too far forward, disrupting facial harmony.
3.8%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
2.6%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.6%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.6%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.6%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.5%The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.5%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.5%The midface is underprojected.
1.8%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
1.7%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
1.6%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.5%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.2%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
1.1%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
0.8%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.6%5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.4%Emily Ha's Harmony score is 5.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Emily Ha is ranked 636th of 679 women on the wiki.