Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


4.1
Below average harmony
Bottom 30%FaceIQ Labs rates Karl Jacobs' Harmony at 4.1, 569th of 602 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Bitemporal Width and Cupid's Bow Depth, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Facial Convexity (Glabella) at 0.7 and Lower Third Proportion at 0.6. Among the other celebrities, Casey Neistat (4.1), Kim Jong un (4.0) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (4.1) sit closest. Matthew Davis has the highest, at 8.8.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
9.5This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.37 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
11.8%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
11.8%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
7.4%The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
7.2%The face appears overly rounded, often due to excessive forward projection of the upper, middle, or lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an overbite or overjet.
7.1%The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
4.6%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
4.2%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.0%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.0%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
3.5%The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
2.9%The lower jaw is too short, reducing lower face strength and balance.
2.9%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.2%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
2.1%The lower lip is excessively thick, creating disproportionate lip proportions.
2.1%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
1.8%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.6%The eyes appear excessively round.
1.4%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.2%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
1.0%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
1.0%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
0.7%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.6%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.6%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.4%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.4%10 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
9.3%Karl Jacobs's Harmony score is 4.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Karl Jacobs is ranked 569th of 602 men on the wiki.