Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


7.1
Great harmony
Top 4.4%FaceIQ Labs rates Martin (Cortis)'s Harmony at 7.1, 310th of 834 men on the wiki, in the top 38%. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Anterior Facial Depth and Bigonial width, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Upper Lip S-Line Position at 2.5 and Browridge Inclination Angle at 1.5. Danny Slavin (Prime) (7.1), Zario Bolanos (7.1) and Adam Cowie (Dante DMC 5) (7.1) come closest to Martin's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a proportionate facial structure; the lower face retains internal balance and harmony with the overall facial structure.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour in both the front and side profiles.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
8.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
8.8This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
8.67 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.5The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
2.6%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
2.4%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.9%The lower lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the upper lip.
1.9%The outer corners of the eyes tilt upward excessively, creating an exaggerated look.
1.8%The midface is underprojected.
1.7%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.4%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.3%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.3%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.1%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
1.0%The eyebrows arch too high, creating an overly expressive or surprised look.
0.8%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.6%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
0.5%4 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
2.5%Martin (Cortis)'s Harmony score is 7.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Martin (Cortis) is ranked 310th of 834 men on the wiki, in the top 38%.