Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio
Your Measurement
1.42x
1.42x
-4.681.341.377.39
Summary
At 1.42x, Matt Walsh's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is above its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x and scores 6.3. Total Facial Height-to-Width Ratio compares facial length to width, distinguishing long, short, or balanced shapes. His value is higher than 80% of the men on the wiki, and 25% of them measure inside the ideal range. The closest values on the wiki belong to Abhishek Bachchan (1.42x), Barrack Obama (1.42x) and Chris Brown (1.42x). The range runs from Paul McCartney at 0.83x to Jeffrey Epstein at 1.66x. Among his other Face Shape measurements, Bitemporal Width (86.3%) scores highest at 10.0 and Cheekbone height (67.1%) lowest at 2.6. It is one of the measurements in Matt's full Harmony breakdown.
Similar Total Facial Width to Height Ratio6
More in Face Shape4
All ratios for Matt Walsh66
Side profile
Share
Questions
What is Matt Walsh's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio?
Matt Walsh's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio measures 1.42x, above its ideal range of 1.34 to 1.37x, for a score of 6.3.
How does Matt Walsh's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio compare with other celebrities?
At 1.42x, Matt Walsh's Total Facial Width to Height Ratio is higher than 80% of the 766 other men on the wiki, and 24% of them measure inside the ideal range.