Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


1.9
Poor harmony
Bottom 0.3%Michael Berryman's Harmony score is 1.9, 961st of 965 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bigonial width and Browridge Inclination Angle, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Total Facial Convexity and Total Facial Width to Height Ratio, both at 0.0. Among the other celebrities, Notorious B.I.G. (1.9), Daniel Larson (2.0) and Marty Feldman (1.8) sit closest. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too upturned nor too downturned.
8.8This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
8.712 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.7The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
17.3%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
15.8%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
12.3%The nose lacks forward projection, appearing flat and less defined in the profile.
8.6%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
8.4%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
8.2%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
7.8%The face is excessively tall and narrow, creating an elongated appearance.
7.7%The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
5.4%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
4.5%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
4.4%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
4.4%The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
3.2%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
3.2%The upper face is too tall, creating an unbalanced forehead proportion.
3.1%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.0%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.0%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
2.9%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.9%The jaw has a softer, rounder shape, often less angular and robust than the ideal.
2.4%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.4%The lower face is too short, reducing chin and jaw prominence.
2.4%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
2.1%The upper lip lacks fullness, appearing too slim relative to the lower lip.
2.1%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.0%The forehead is excessively wide, creating a disproportionate upper face.
1.9%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.8%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.6%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
1.6%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
1.5%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
1.2%The vertical jawbone is too short, leading to inadequate jaw height and definition.
1.0%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.8%The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.7%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.5%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.7%Michael Berryman's Harmony score is 1.9 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Michael Berryman is ranked 961st of 965 men on the wiki.