Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.1
Poor harmony
Bottom 7.2%In FaceIQ Labs' Harmony analysis, Mother Teresa scores 3.1, 526th of 533 women on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of her breakdown are Eye Aspect Ratio and Facial Depth to Height Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, One Eye Apart Test at 0.3 and Lower Third at 0.2. Cherry Babe (3.0), Lizzie Velásquez (3.4) and Evangelina (Evangelinaglow) (3.7) come closest to Mother's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Sharam Diniz, at 9.2.
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.210 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
8.4%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
7.8%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
7.3%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
6.5%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.5%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
6.5%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.8%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
5.4%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
5.0%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
4.4%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
4.0%The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
3.7%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
3.0%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
2.9%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.6%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.6%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.2%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
2.1%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.0%The neck is excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
2.0%The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
1.6%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.6%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
1.3%The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
1.2%The jaw appears excessively broad, often due to muscle bulk or fat, reducing definition.
1.2%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
0.8%11 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
8.8%Mother Teresa's Harmony score is 3.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Mother Teresa is ranked 526th of 533 women on the wiki.