Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


5.5
Good harmony
Top 45%Naomi Scott ranks 349th of 372 women on the FaceIQ Labs celebrity wiki, scoring 5.5 on her Harmony score, which measures how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. Her strongest measurements in this section are Naomi's Anterior Facial Depth score and Naomi's Bigonial width score, both scoring 10.0, while her weakest is Naomi's Lower Third score at 1.4. Her closest matches on the wiki are Pokimane at 5.5, Jada Pinkett Smith at 5.5 and Janhvi Kapoor at 5.6. At the other end of the scale, Sharam Diniz holds the highest score on the wiki at 9.1.
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.4This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
8.86 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
6.7%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.8%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
5.5%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
4.8%The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
4.5%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.3%The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.3%The cheekbones are positioned too low, reducing midface prominence and youthfulness.
3.3%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
2.6%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.6%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.6%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
2.5%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
2.4%The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
1.9%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
1.9%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
1.4%The nose bridge is excessively narrow.
1.0%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
1.0%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.8%The lips lack a prominent cupid's bow, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
0.2%5 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
3.5%Naomi Scott's Harmony score is 5.5 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Naomi Scott is ranked 354th of 378 women on the wiki.