Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


2.3
Poor harmony
Bottom 0.8%FaceIQ Labs rates Peter Dinklage's Harmony at 2.3, 766th of 772 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Bitemporal Width and Cupid's Bow Depth, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) and Jaw Frontal Angle, both at 0.0. Ben Shapiro (2.2), Julian Richings (2.2) and Juice WRLD (2.3) come closest to Peter's Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is Alain Delon(prime), at 9.0.
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows having ideal horizontal length relative to face width.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.7This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the lower lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.6This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
9.1This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
8.710 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
15.4%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
13.6%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
11.2%The jaw lacks curvature, appearing straight and less dynamic in shape.
9.1%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
8.7%The eyes are too far apart, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.
7.3%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
6.6%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
6.2%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
6.2%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
6.1%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
5.0%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
4.0%The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
3.9%The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.5%The eyes are too small, creating a less balanced facial appearance.
3.4%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
3.2%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
3.1%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
2.9%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
2.9%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
2.6%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
2.6%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.3%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
2.2%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
2.2%The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
1.9%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.2%The forehead is too flat, lacking natural curvature and prominence.
0.8%The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.8%The nose tip is excessively pointed, creating a harsh appearance.
0.7%The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.3%6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
5.0%Peter Dinklage's Harmony score is 2.3 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Peter Dinklage is ranked 766th of 772 men on the wiki.