Loading Harmony
Harmony
Tom Holland
Harmony
6.5
Very good harmony
Top 14%Side profile
Summary
Tom Holland's Harmony score is 6.5, 459th of 910 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Browridge Inclination Angle and Chin to philtrum ratio, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Mentolabial Angle at 3.4 and Recession relative to frankfort plane at 1.6. Cameron Hill (6.6), Ezra Miller (6.6) and Jamshad Cethirakath (6.5) come closest to Tom's Harmony score. David Rosenberg (Model) has the highest, at 8.9.
Strengths
- Ideal ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0 - Well-projected nose
This indicates optimal forward projection relative to nasal height and facial structure.
10.0 - Balanced nasal profile
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose having a balanced shape and projection.
10.0 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0 - Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
10.0 - Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
10.0 - Ideal forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0 - Ideal upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0 - Ideal neck width
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
10.0 - Defined neck contour
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
10.0 - Ideal cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
10.0 - Excellent maxillary projection
This contributes to a pleasant midface projection by indicating that the upper jaw is not overly projected or recessed.
9.9 - Harmonious midface and jaw alignment
This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.8 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
9.8 - Excellent mouth width
This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.7 - Balanced jaw shape
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.6 - Balanced nose length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.6 - Balanced midface length
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface not being overly elongated or shortened.
9.5 - Balanced brow ridge
This contributes to a pleasant upper face due to the brow ridge being neither too harsh or soft.
9.5 - Excellent jaw length
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
9.4 - Excellent jaw steepness
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.4 - Excellent jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4 - Excellent interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
9.4 - Excellent nose width
This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4 - Balanced eye shape
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
9.3 - Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
9.1 - Additional Strengths
4 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8
Areas for improvement
- Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.9% - Mandibular recession
The lower jaw is set back, creating a less prominent chin and an unbalanced profile.
3.9% - Underprojected chin
The chin lacks forward projection, creating a weak lower face appearance.
3.9% - Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
3.6% - Protruded ears
The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
2.6% - Underprojected midface
The midface is underprojected.
2.1% - Medium-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
1.7% - Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
1.2% - Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.0% - Sunken orbital region
The area around the eyes appears hollow, reducing vibrancy and youthfulness.
0.9% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.7% - Short top third
The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
0.5% - Narrow forehead
The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.5% - Overly wide nose bridge
The nose bridge is excessively wide.
0.3% - Minor Proportional Variations
6 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.2%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Tom Holland's Harmony score?
Tom Holland's Harmony score is 6.5 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Tom Holland's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Tom Holland is ranked 459th of 910 men on the wiki.