Loading ratio
Your Measurement
Facial Depth to Height Ratio
Your Measurement
1.44x
1.44x
-4.721.301.447.46
Summary
At 1.44x, Mathematically Perfect Male Face's Facial Depth to Height Ratio is inside its ideal range of 1.30 to 1.44x and scores 10.0. The Facial Depth to Height Ratio evaluates forward facial growth by comparing facial depth (subnasale to tragus) to facial height (nasion to mentolabial fold). The value is higher than 85% of the men on the wiki, and 50% of them measure inside the ideal range. Among the other celebrities, Alan Wilder (1.44x), Charlie Matthews (1.44x) and Christopher Reeves (1.44x) sit closest. At either end, Jack Doherty has the highest at 1.91x and John Turk the lowest at 0.41x. Of his other Facial Profile measurements, Z Angle (79.8°) is the strongest at 10.0 and Total Facial Convexity (152.6°) the weakest at 6.9. It counts toward his Harmony score.
Similar Facial Depth to Height Ratio6
More in Facial Profile7
All ratios for Mathematically Perfect Male Face66
Side profile
Share
Questions
What is Mathematically Perfect Male Face's Facial Depth to Height Ratio?
Mathematically Perfect Male Face's Facial Depth to Height Ratio measures 1.44x, inside its ideal range of 1.30 to 1.44x, for a score of 10.0.
How does Mathematically Perfect Male Face's Facial Depth to Height Ratio compare with other celebrities?
At 1.44x, Mathematically Perfect Male Face's Facial Depth to Height Ratio is higher than 86% of the 892 other men on the wiki, and 48% of them measure inside the ideal range.