Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.1
Poor harmony
Bottom 6.4%FaceIQ Labs rates Igor Bogdanoff's Harmony at 3.1, 852nd of 879 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Anterior Facial Depth and Browridge Inclination Angle, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Deviation of IAA(Ipsilateral alar angle) & JFA(Jaw frontal angle) at 0.3 and Nose Tip Position at 0.2. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Matt Walsh (3.1), D-Low (Beatbox) (3.1) and Thomas Matthew Crooks (3.1). The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the face being neither too short nor too long.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the nose not lacking vertical length or being overly long.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
9.8This contributes to a harmonious cheek region; the cheekbones are high-set and provide structural support to the midface.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.6This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being positioned neither too high nor too low.
9.5This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.4This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.210 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6The jaw angles sharply downward, creating a narrow or pointed chin effect.
14.3%The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
12.0%The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
9.6%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
8.2%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
6.1%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.1%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
5.1%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
3.9%The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
3.4%The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
3.0%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.0%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.0%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
3.0%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
2.9%The eyes are too slim and elongated, creating a squinted appearance.
2.9%The vertical jawbone is too short, leading to inadequate jaw height and definition.
2.7%The nose is too broad, creating an unbalanced facial appearance.
2.7%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
2.4%The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
2.3%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
1.3%The upper lip is set too far back, creating a flat or thin appearance.
1.1%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
0.8%The nose droops downward, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
0.8%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.6%The upper forehead slopes backward excessively.
0.5%7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.4%Igor Bogdanoff's Harmony score is 3.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Igor Bogdanoff is ranked 852nd of 879 men on the wiki.