Loading Harmony
Harmony
Loading Harmony
Harmony
Harmony


3.2
Poor harmony
Bottom 7.7%FaceIQ Labs rates Magnus Carlsen's Harmony at 3.2, 839th of 871 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. At the top of his breakdown are Eye Aspect Ratio and Facial Depth to Height Ratio, both at 10.0; at the bottom, Facial Convexity (Glabella) at 1.0 and Lower Third at 0.2. Matt Gaetz (3.2), Tyler, the Creator (3.1) and Rakai (3.1) come closest to Magnus' Harmony score. The highest on the wiki is David Rosenberg (Model), at 8.9.
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyes being neither too round nor too narrow.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the midface having ideal forward projection.
10.0This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
10.0This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.9This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw having ideal proportions.
9.8This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too steep nor too flat.
9.7This contributes to a pleasant mouth contour by indicating that the mouth is neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3This contributes to a harmonious face shape due to the midface and jaw shapes aligning perfectly.
9.3This contributes to a pleasant nose contour due to the nose being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck being neither too wide nor too thin.
9.2This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
8.7This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour by indicating that the forehead is neither too steep nor too flat.
8.53 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.8The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
13.9%The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
11.4%The upper jaw is too short, creating an unbalanced lower face proportion.
10.0%The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
9.0%The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
9.0%The jaw grows with a flatter angle, resulting in a short or overly wide lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as a deep bite or overbite.
8.8%The eyes are positioned too close together, reducing midface balance.
7.5%The face appears flattened or slightly concave, often due to an overprojected chin or recessed maxilla. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an underbite.
7.3%The middle of the face is too short, appearing compressed or wide.
6.8%The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
6.2%The nose appears too soft and weak, creating an unbalanced nasal profile.
6.0%The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.1%The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
4.7%The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
3.0%The ears protrude excessively from the head, creating an unbalanced profile appearance.
2.6%The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
2.3%The nose is too short vertically, creating a less balanced midface.
2.3%The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.5%The central midface is too wide, often due to wide-set eyes or a short nose.
1.4%The midface is too short vertically, compressing the central face.
1.3%The lower lip juts out excessively, unbalancing the lower face.
1.3%The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
1.2%The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
1.0%The neck lacks angularity, appearing soft and undefined in the profile view.
0.9%The eyebrows lack arch or tilt, appearing straight and less dynamic.
0.7%The forehead is too slim relative to the face, reducing upper face balance.
0.7%The mouth corners are downturned, creating a frowning or sad appearance.
0.4%8 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
6.4%Magnus Carlsen's Harmony score is 3.2 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
By Harmony score, Magnus Carlsen is ranked 839th of 871 men on the wiki.