Loading Harmony
Harmony
Paul McCartney
Harmony
4.1
Below average harmony
Bottom 31%Side profile
Summary
Paul McCartney's Harmony score is 4.1, 584th of 619 men on the wiki. Harmony rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges. His strongest measurements are Anterior Facial Depth and Ear Protrusion Angle, both at 10.0, and his weakest are Middle Third and Total Facial Width to Height Ratio, both at 0.0. The closest Harmony scores on the wiki belong to Casey Neistat (4.1), Karl Jacobs (4.1) and Giannis Antetokounmpo (4.1). Matthew Davis has the highest, at 8.8.
Strengths
- Ideal interior midface width
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the central midface being neither too narrow or broad.
10.0 - Harmonious ear protrusion
This contributes to a balanced frontal profile by indicating that the ears project neither too far from nor too close to the head.
10.0 - Ideal upper forehead slope
This contributes to a pleasant upper forehead contour by indicating that the upper forehead slopes at an ideal angle.
10.0 - Balanced eyebrow tilt
This contributes to a harmonious eye region due to the eyebrows being tilted neither too upward nor too downward.
10.0 - Ideal eye size
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being proportionate in size relative to facial width.
10.0 - Ideal eye spacing
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the eyes being neither too close nor too far apart.
10.0 - Ideal forehead width
This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
10.0 - Harmonious facial convexity
This contributes to a pleasant facial profile by indicating balanced curvature; the facial profile is neither too flat nor too curved.
10.0 - Refined nasal tip
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nasal tip being well-defined and proportionate.
9.9 - Well-positioned upper lip
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip sitting neither too far forward nor too far back.
9.8 - Balanced upper lip fullness
This contributes to a harmonious mouth region due to the upper lip being neither too full nor too thin.
9.8 - Excellent ramus length
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour by indicating the vertical part of the jawbone has ideal length.
9.8 - Excellent cupid's bow depth
This contributes to a harmonious lip region due to the cupid's bow having ideal definition and depth.
9.5 - Well-contoured orbital region
This contributes to a harmonious midface due to the area around the eyes having sufficient volume and projection.
9.3 - Excellent nose bridge width
This contributes to a harmonious nasal profile due to the nose bridge being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.3 - Defined neck contour
This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the neck having a sharp, angular contour.
9.2 - Good jaw width
This contributes to a pleasant jaw contour due to the jaw being neither too wide nor too narrow.
9.1 - Additional Strengths
10 ratios showing strong performance but not fitting into specific categorized strengths.
9.6
Areas for improvement
- Long midface
The middle of the face is elongated, creating an unbalanced vertical proportion.
9.4% - Long upper jaw
The upper jaw is excessively long, unbalancing the lower face proportions.
8.1% - Overly compact face shape
The entire face is too short and wide, reducing overall proportion.
7.7% - Hyper-divergent jaw growth
The jaw grows with an overly steep angle, resulting in a long or narrow lower face. This can indicate malocclusion, such as an open bite or underbite.
6.1% - Insufficient eye tilt
The outer corners of the eyes tilt downward, giving a droopy or sad look.
5.1% - Disproportionate lower face (short chin or long philtrum)
The chin appears too short relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too long relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
5.0% - Maxillary recession
The upper jaw is less forward than ideal, reducing midface projection and facial harmony.
4.4% - Overprojected chin
The chin extends too far forward, unbalancing the facial profile.
4.4% - Overly harsh and prominent jaw
The jaw has a harsher, more robust, and prominent appearance than the ideal.
3.1% - Disproportionate lower face (long chin or short philtrum)
The chin appears too long relative to the philtrum, OR the philtrum appears too short relative to the chin. Since we measure ratios rather than absolute lengths, these two conditions cannot be distinguished and represent the same proportional imbalance in the lower face.
3.1% - Long nose
The nose is too long vertically, unbalancing the midface proportions.
3.1% - Elongated lower jaw
The lower jaw is too long, creating a heavy or extended lower face.
3.1% - Long middle third
The midface is too tall, elongating the central face.
3.1% - Long lower third
The lower face is too tall, creating an elongated chin and jaw.
3.1% - Short top third
The upper face (forehead) is too short, reducing vertical balance.
3.1% - Overprojected nose
The nose protrudes excessively, dominating the facial profile.
2.7% - Soft and weak brow ridge
The forehead has a softer, less prominent ridge than the ideal.
2.6% - Narrow mouth
The mouth is too slim, reducing expressiveness and facial proportion.
2.2% - Overly round eye shape
The eyes appear excessively round.
1.4% - Disharmonious midface and jaw alignment
The midface and jaw shapes do not align, reducing facial harmony.
1.3% - Medium-set cheekbones
The cheekbones are moderately low, providing limited midface definition.
1.1% - Medium-set eyebrows
The eyebrows are positioned slightly too high, altering the upper face's proportions and resulting in a less striking appearance.
0.8% - Thin neck
The neck is too slim, appearing delicate and less proportionate to the face.
0.8% - Lacking eyebrow length
The eyebrows lack adequate horizontal length.
0.6% - Overly sloped forehead appearance
The forehead slopes backward excessively, altering upper face proportions.
0.5% - Minor Proportional Variations
7 ratios showing minor proportional variations that contribute to overall harmony score.
4.7%
Similar harmony6
Share
Questions
What is Paul McCartney's Harmony score?
Paul McCartney's Harmony score is 4.1 in FaceIQ Labs' analysis, which rates how closely the face's proportions, front and side, fall inside their ideal ranges.
How does Paul McCartney's Harmony compare with other celebrities?
By Harmony score, Paul McCartney is ranked 584th of 619 men on the wiki.