All Harmony guides

Harmony · Side view · Nose

Nasolabial Angle

The angle between the underside of the nose and the upper lip at the nose base.

What is measured

The calculation

Angle: columella → subnasale → upper-lip landmark

Side view / Measurement guide

Nasolabial Angle: side-view measurement illustrationAn original schematic showing A: Nose–lip junction. Lines identify the landmarks used; the drawing is not to scale.A

Follow the measurement

ANose–lip junction

Dots mark the landmarks. Lines show how the measurement is taken.

Schematic illustration, not to scale. Lines show the measurement construction; this is not an ideal face or a scored result.

In these guides, nasion means the nasal root, subnasale the nose base, and pogonion the most forward chin point. Frankfort refers to the direction from the ear-opening landmark to the lower orbital landmark.

Why it matters

It connects two neighboring contours. A change in upper-lip projection can change the angle even when nasal rotation stays the same, which is why both arms deserve attention.

  • Lower: a more closed nose–lip junction.
  • Higher: a more open nose–lip junction.

Where the idea comes from

Clinical reference

This is a long-used clinical nose–lip measure. Biller and Kim and later nasal preference studies tested related nose shapes, while stressing the role of the full face and the specific sample. [1] [2]

A worked example

A 100° junction is more closed than a 115° junction. Either nose-underside rotation or upper-lip direction can cause the difference.

Example values explain the calculation. They are not a target range and are not measurements of the schematic above.

Research & further reading

The sources below explain the history or related evidence. FaceIQ’s score weights and reference ranges are model settings; these papers do not collectively validate the scoring system.

  1. [1] Biller & Kim · 2009

    A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences

    Compared ratings of edited brow and nose features on four female models. The authors emphasized individual facial harmony; this is context for feature relationships, not a test of every brow metric.

  2. [2] Tavakoli et al. · 2023

    Ideal Nasal Preferences: A Quantitative Investigation with 3D Imaging in the Iranian Population

    Asked 203 volunteers to rate edited nose features on one male and one female model. Supports studying angles and projection together, with limits from the sampled faces and raters.

Explore this region